Frequently Asked Questions: What are the key points from CIEEM’s response?

✅ Nature and development can work together – CIEEM emphasises that nature is not a barrier to development when properly integrated into planning.

✅ No clear evidence for the proposed reforms – CIEEM suggests that better resourcing and improved implementation of the current system could be a more effective and efficient solution.

✅ The Mitigation Hierarchy must be upheld – CIEEM warns against using the proposed Nature Restoration Fund as a substitute for avoiding and reducing environmental harm.

✅ Early engagement of environmental professionals – CIEEM highlights that this approach can provide greater certainty and clarity for developers.

✅ Resourcing statutory agencies and Local Planning Authorities – CIEEM stresses that adequate funding would enable faster decision-making and encourage private sector investment in nature recovery.

✅ The role of site-based surveys – CIEEM underscores that Biodiversity Net Gain and effective planning decisions still require data collection and monitoring.

✅ Environmental principles must remain central – CIEEM insists that any planning reforms should respect polluter pays, correction at source, and precautionary principles.